CCommons

van't Hoff factor for association and dissociation: deriving i with α, and why NaCl never shows exactly 2

Second attempt, and I want this chapter to be a strength.

Siddharth RaoDropper Sample

12 Oct 2026 · 1 min read

Last year this was where I dropped silly marks, so this time I'm trying to actually understand instead of cramming.

What I know: the observed colligative property is different from the calculated one when solute associates or dissociates. We define

i=observed colligative propertycalculated colligative property=normal molar massabnormal (observed) molar massi = \frac{\text{observed colligative property}}{\text{calculated colligative property}} = \frac{\text{normal molar mass}}{\text{abnormal (observed) molar mass}}

and the corrected formulas are ΔTf=iKfm\Delta T_f = i K_f m, π=iCRT\pi = iCRT, and so on.

What I'm shaky on:

  1. The relation between ii and degree of dissociation α\alpha for a compound that gives nn ions: I remember i=1+(n−1)αi = 1 + (n-1)\alpha but can't derive it, and for association (like acetic acid dimerising in benzene) I mix the signs.
  2. How many particles for K₄[Fe(CN)₆]? I often count wrong in objective questions.
  3. NCERT's table shows ii for NaCl at 0.1 m is a bit less than 2 even though NaCl is a strong electrolyte. Why? Complete dissociation should give exactly 2.

Any clean derivations and a small worked example would be great.

WhatsAppPost on X

6 answers & replies

Sign in to join the conversation.

  • [+]Nisha Verma12thSample· 8d ago

    Derivation for dissociation. Start with 1 mol of solute, fraction α\alpha dissociates into nn particles each:

    • left undissociated: 1−α1 - \alpha
    • ions formed: nαn\alpha
    • total after dissociation: 1−α+nα=1+(n−1)α1 - \alpha + n\alpha = 1 + (n-1)\alpha

    Since the colligative property depends on the number of particles, i=1+(n−1)α1=1+(n−1)αi = \frac{1 + (n-1)\alpha}{1} = 1 + (n-1)\alpha.

    Example: BaCl₂ with α=0.9\alpha = 0.9: n=3n = 3, i=1+2(0.9)=2.8i = 1 + 2(0.9) = 2.8.

  • [+]Mehak AroraDropperSample· 8d ago

    For counting particles, K₄[Fe(CN)₆] gives 4 K⁺ ions, so i = 4. The complex ion is one unit so it doesn't count separately, it just stays together like one block... I think the 4 is from potassium only. That's how I did it in the last two tests and I got those right by luck maybe?

    • [+]Ishita GoyalDropperSample· 8d ago

      Mehak, the complex anion [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ is also a particle in solution, just a single (big) one. So the dissociation is

      K4[Fe(CN)6]→4K++[Fe(CN)6]4−K_4[Fe(CN)_6] \to 4K^+ + [Fe(CN)_6]^{4-}

      That's 4 + 1 = 5 particles, so i=5i = 5 for complete dissociation. The complex stays intact (it doesn't break into Fe and CN), but it still counts as one particle. Similarly [Cu(NH₃)₄]SO₄ gives 2 and K₃[Fe(CN)₆] gives 4.

  • [+]Pooja Iyer12thSample· 8d ago

    Association mirrors it. Say nn molecules join to make 1 big molecule, with degree of association α\alpha. Start with 1 mol of monomer:

    • remaining monomer: 1−α1 - \alpha
    • associated particles formed: α/n\alpha/n
    • total: 1−α+α/n1 - \alpha + \alpha/n

    i=1−α(1−1n)i = 1 - \alpha\left(1 - \frac1n\right)

    For acetic acid dimerising in benzene (n=2n = 2), full association α=1\alpha = 1 gives i=0.5i = 0.5. If α=0.8\alpha = 0.8, i=1−0.8×0.5=0.6i = 1 - 0.8\times0.5 = 0.6. So i<1i<1 for association, i>1i>1 for dissociation.

    • [+]Siddharth RaoDropperSample· 7d agoAuthor

      Both derivations are clear now. The 'particles count' idea is the key, I will stop memorising two separate formulas. Thank you, I owe you all chai.

  • [+]Zoya Khan12thSample· 7d ago

    On (3): in a solution that is not infinitely dilute, oppositely charged ions pull on each other and some of them stay close for a bit (ion pairing). Each one doesn't behave as a fully independent particle, so the effective number of free particles is slightly less than 2, and ii is slightly less than 2. As the solution gets more dilute the ions are farther apart, the attraction matters less, and ii comes closer and closer to 2. NaCl is a strong electrolyte, so it's 'fully dissociated into ions', but it's not 'ideal'.

More from Siddharth Rao