Group 13 ionisation enthalpy doesn't decrease smoothly (Ga > Al, Tl > In). Is that the inert pair effect or something else?
Mehak AroraDropper Sample
19 Sept 2026 Β· 1 min read
It's 3 am again and the anxiety is doing its thing, so I'm doing chemistry instead of staring at the ceiling.
Group 13 data from NCERT. First ionisation enthalpy (kJ/mol): B 801, Al 577, Ga 579, In 558, Tl 589. I expected a steady decrease down the group as size increases, like in group 1. But Ga is slightly higher than Al, and Tl is higher than In. Atomic radii (pm): B 85, Al 143, Ga 135, In 167, Tl 170. Ga is smaller than Al even though it's a period below?!
My teacher said "inert pair effect" and moved on. But I thought inert pair effect is about oxidation states, like why Tl prefers +1 and Al prefers +3. Is it actually the reason for this IE anomaly too, or are there two different ideas getting mixed? I'd really like to understand rather than write a line I don't believe.
Also, why is BCl3 a Lewis acid? I know it has 6 electrons, but my notes aren't clear how that connects to the group 13 trend topic.
7 answers & replies
Sign in to join the conversation.
[+][β]Tushar PawarDropperSampleΒ· 1mo ago
It's the inert pair effect. Electrons in the s orbital don't get involved, that's why ionisation is higher for Ga and Tl.
[+][β]Arjun Nair12thSampleΒ· 1mo ago
Mehak is right to be suspicious. Inert pair effect is about the oxidation state (the pair not taking part in bonding, so Tl+ is more stable than Tl3+). It doesn't explain the IE anomaly directly. The anomaly comes from poor shielding.
Between Al and Ga, the ten 3d electrons are added. d electrons are poor at shielding the nuclear charge. So effective nuclear charge felt by the outer electron goes up more than usual, and Ga is slightly smaller than Al (135 vs 143 pm) and holds its electron a bit tighter. Same story between In and Tl, with the added 4f electrons (and 5d), which shield very poorly (lanthanoid contraction).
[+][β]Tushar PawarDropperSampleΒ· 1mo ago
Okay, makes sense, I was mixing the two. Both effects are real, they just answer different questions.
[+][β]Mehak AroraDropperSampleΒ· 1mo agoAuthor
this is exactly what I needed, "poor shielding for IE, inert pair for oxidation state". Two ideas, two questions. Going to sleep now, thank you π
[+][β]Kavya NaikDropperSampleΒ· 1mo ago
The full order from NCERT numbers: B > Tl > Ga > Al > In. Write it as B (801), Tl (589), Ga (579), Al (577), In (558). Examiners love "which is the correct order of IE?" and the tricky parts are Tl high and In lowest.
[+][β]Rahul DubeyDropperSampleΒ· 1mo ago
Now connecting your other question. Because the three valence electrons are , the group's common state is +3. Down the group, +1 gets more stable. That's the inert pair effect: the pair is held tight and doesn't take part in bonding, so Tl+ is more stable than Tl3+. That's why is a good oxidising agent (it wants to go to +1) and is not.
For boron, which has just 6 electrons in (three bonds, no lone pair), the octet is incomplete, so it accepts a lone pair from something like and forms . That is why it's a Lewis acid. Boron's small size also makes it show covalent chemistry only, no ions.
[+][β]Aman YadavDropperSampleΒ· 1mo ago
Last point: Al is amphoteric. Reacts with both acid and base: . Examiners like this when comparing with group 13 oxide behaviour: is acidic, and are amphoteric, and are basic. Acidic to basic as you go down.




