Kepler's laws: I can recite them, but can't use them. Is planetary speed constant? Which 'a' in T² ∝ a³?
Aarav Kulkarni11th Sample
27 Aug 2026 · 1 min read
I made a checklist for Gravitation and Kepler's laws is where my ticks stopped.
Law 1: orbit is an ellipse with the Sun at one focus. Law 2: line joining the planet and the Sun sweeps equal areas in equal intervals of time. Law 3: .
I can recite them, but I can't use them.
(i) Law 2: if areas are equal in equal times, is the planet's speed constant? My gut says no, but how much faster is it near the Sun and why does NCERT bring angular momentum in?
(ii) A PYQ-style question: planet A has orbit radius 4 times that of planet B, both nearly circular around the same star. Ratio of their periods? I wrote , then and got confused about which one to use. I think the answer is 8 but I can't justify it.
(iii) In an ellipse, which "a" goes into ? Is it the average distance from the Sun?
(iv) If an orbit is a circle, are Kepler's laws still valid, or only for ellipses?
7 answers & replies
Sign in to join the conversation.
[+][–]Neel Chatterjee12thSample· 1mo ago
Law 2 is angular momentum conservation. Gravity is a central force, so the torque about the Sun is zero and is constant. The areal velocity is
So the planet cannot have constant speed. Where it is closer, it must move faster. At perihelion and aphelion the velocity is perpendicular to the radius, so . Closer means faster, in exact inverse proportion to the distance.
[+][–]Aman YadavDropperSample· 1mo ago
(ii) Use Law 3. , so .
.
You squared T on one side and cubed r on the other, that's why you got confused. Never apply 16 or 64 alone. Pick the form and do it in one line.
[+][–]Rohan Sharma11thSample· 1mo ago
Isn't Law 2 just conservation of energy? Speed increases because potential energy decreases as it goes near the Sun. i read that somewhere lol
[+][–]Neel Chatterjee12thSample· 1mo ago
Rohan, energy is also conserved (KE goes up as PE goes down), and it explains the speed change. But the equal-area statement itself comes from angular momentum, not energy. A planet could be in a circular orbit with energy conserved and areas equal, and an elliptical one too; the area law is about L.
[+][–]Ishita GoyalDropperSample· 1mo ago
(iii) It's the semi-major axis, which is half of the longest diameter of the ellipse. It equals the average of the nearest and farthest distances, .
(iv) A circle is just an ellipse with both foci together at the centre, so and everything works. The laws were not "for ellipses only", they're for any bound orbit of an inverse-square force.
[+][–]Rahul DubeyDropperSample· 1mo ago
Where does Law 3 come from? Do it for a circle, once. Gravity gives the centripetal force:
So the constant is , which depends only on the central body (the Sun), not on the planet's mass. Same logic explains why all planets share one constant, and Earth satellites share a different constant. For ellipses r gets replaced by a.
Third attempt and I still enjoy this derivation. 🙂
[+][–]Aarav Kulkarni11thSample· 1mo agoAuthor
thank you, ticking all four boxes now. the T ∝ r^(3/2) one-liner is going on my formula card




